Trends of Pandemic Parenting in Medical Academia.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic has been difficult on physicians, with two fifths of doctors in one survey reporting that their mental health is now worse than before the pandemic. It is likely that a significant proportion of these physicians are parents of children necessitating childcare, as approximately 32% of the US workforce has someone in their household under the age of 14. We sought to study the impact of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on physician parents in academia. Our goal was to investigate the intersection of professional and personal challenges, as well as perceived impact on domestic life and professional development secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Using Survey Monkey, we developed a 37-question survey to address the aim of this study. Questions were grouped into four categories: demographics; impact on childcare; impact on care; and impact on mental health/wellness. Most of the questions were multiple choice with a few fill-in-the-blank options to allow participants to provide additional information related to their experiences as physicians during the pandemic. A link to the survey was disseminated via email to physicians at our home institution, Rush University Medical Center (Chicago), via our own intra- and interdepartmental communications, We used private social media accounts such as Facebook physician groups to reach out to physicians at other academic medical centers. Survey responses were voluntary and collected anonymously over an eight-week period, without identifiable data. Inclusion criteria included any physician identifying themselves as working full or full or part time in an academic facility in the US and caregivers for children <18 years. RESULTS: Survey respondents were mostly female (83.2%), practicing in the Midwest (61.2%), and ranked as assistant professor (59.5%). The majority of respondents had two children (65.1%) who were <11 years in age (85.6%). Most respondents worked full time with 72.8% working over 50% clinically. Childcare was disrupted for 171 of 232 respondents (73.7%); 62.9% struggled with balancing work with childcare; 81.9% worried often or very often about fulfilling their responsibilities. A vast majority, 210 of 232 respondents (90.5%) had some degree of concern about feeling overburdened by their roles. More than half (57.3%) worried that their professional advancement was impacted by the pandemic, and 53.9% considered making adjustments to their clinical workload/. Over half (51.6%) thought that increased domestic responsibilities impacted their professional advancement. CONCLUSION: In the survey, which was completed primarily by early-career women physicians practicing in a variety of specialties and geographic regions, we noted that childcare disruption amidst the pandemic was extremely prevalent. The majority of respondents reported full-time equivalent work; thus, it is reasonable to assume that significant workloads and limitations in remote work in combination with childcare constraints resulted in significant burden. A large number felt the challenges were negatively impacting their professional development and felt overburdened by their various roles.

Dysphagia outcomes in COVID-19 patients: experiences in long-term acute care hospital (LTACH).

PURPOSE: Long term acute care hospitals (LTACHs) saw a significant increase in COVID-19 patients with prolonged acute illness recovery. Speech language pathologists (SLP) in LTACHs were integral in assessing swallowing and providing rehabilitation for dysphagia, however, there is limited research on LTACHs and dysphagia. Our aim was to describe this unique dysphagia management experience to improve future patient care. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted for patients admitted to RML Specialty Hospital for respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 from April 1, 2020 to October 31, 2021. Demographic information, videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) reports with Penetration and Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores and SLP notes were reviewed. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients met inclusion criteria. Most patients presented with tracheostomy (93.9%) and were NPO (92.5%) on admission. A strong correlation (p = 0.029) was noted between dependence on mechanical ventilation and significant airway invasion, as indicated by PAS score of 7 or 8 on VFSS. There was a strong association (p = 0.001) between patients who had tracheostomy placed within 33 days of VFSS and recommendation for thin liquids. Upon discharge, the majority of patients (83.57%) transitioned successfully to oral diets, however, a strong association (p = 0.009) between higher age (≥ 62) and NPO at discharge was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Patients admitted post COVID-19 to LTACH, especially those requiring tracheostomy, demonstrated various degrees of dysphagia and benefited from SLP intervention and instrumental swallow assessments. Most patients admitted to LTACH for COVID-19 were successfully rehabilitated for dysphagia.

Prevalence of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients diagnosed with subglottic stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: In the wake of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), patients with subglottic stenosis (SGS) have a new, seemingly ubiquitous, respiratory disease to contend with. Whether real or perceived, it is likely that patients with SGS will feel exposed during the current pandemic. This study seeks to determine whether patients with SGS have increased rates of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic relative to healthy controls, as well as how much of an impact the pandemic itself plays in the mental health of this population. METHODS: Retrospective review of 10 patients with a confirmed SGS diagnosis and 21 control patients were surveyed via telephone. Patients of all ages that had an in-person or virtual visit within 3 months of the survey start date were included. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were surveyed in this study, of whom 67.8 % were in the control group and 32.2 % were comprised of patients diagnosed with SGS. SGS patients reported a significantly higher level of anxiety on the GAD-7 scale with severe anxiety in 20 % of patients, moderate anxiety in 50 % of patients, mild anxiety in 20 %, and 10 % reporting no anxiety. Overall, the average reported GAD-7 score of the SGS patients and control patients were 10.8 ± 4.96 and 6.67 ± 2.96 respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first of its kind to analyze the rates and causes of anxiety within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients diagnosed with subglottic stenosis. SGS patients were found to have a significantly higher anxiety based on the GAD-7 survey in comparison to patients without SGS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Effect of Implementing Simulation Education on Health Care Worker Comfort With Nasopharyngeal Swabbing for COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if rapid implementation of simulation training for the nasopharyngeal swab procedure can increase provider confidence regarding procedure competency. METHODS: A simulation training exercise was designed as a departmental initiative to improve competency performing nasopharyngeal swabs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sixty-one health care workers attended teaching sessions led by the Department of Otorhinolaryngology on proper nasopharyngeal swab technique. After a brief lecture, participants practiced their swab technique using a high-fidelity airway simulation model. Pre- and postintervention self-evaluations were measured via standardized clinical competency questionnaires on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "No knowledge, unable to perform" up to "Highly knowledgeable and confident, independent." RESULTS: Forty-six participants in this study submitted pre- and postintervention self-assessments. Postintervention scores improved on average 1.41 points (95% CI, 1.10-1.73) out of 5 from a mean score of 3.13 to 4.54 (P < .0001). This reflects a large effect size with a Glass's delta value of 1.3. DISCUSSION: Lecture coupled with simulation-based teaching can significantly improve health care workers' confidence in performing nasopharyngeal swabs. Proper training for frontline workers performing swabs for COVID-19 is essential to improving testing accuracy and can be achieved in a simple and timely manner. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: To meet the testing needs of the growing pandemic, many health care workers who are unfamiliar with nasopharyngeal swabs have been asked to perform this test. Simulation-based teaching sessions may improve health care workers' confidence and help prevent false-negative results. This intervention is easily reproducible in any setting where frequent nasopharyngeal swab testing occurs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.

Rapid implementation of COVID-19 tracheostomy simulation training to increase surgeon safety and confidence.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if rapid implementation of simulation training for anticipated COVID-19 tracheostomy procedures can increase physician confidence regarding procedure competency and use of enhanced personal protective equipment (PPE). METHODS: A brief simulation training exercise was designed in conjunction with the development of a COVID-19 Tracheostomy Protocol. The simulation training focused primarily on provider safety, pre and post-surgical steps and the proper use of enhanced PPE. Simulation training was performed in the simulation lab at the institution over 2 days. Pre and post self-evaluations were measured using standardized clinical competency questionnaires on a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from "No knowledge, unable to perform" up to "Highly knowledgeable and confident, independent." RESULTS: Physicians self-reported a significant increase in knowledge and competency immediately after completing the training exercise. Resident physicians increased from a mean score of 3.00 to 4.67, p-value 0.0041, mean increase 1.67 (CI 95% 0.81 to 2.52). Attending physicians increased from a mean score of 2.89 to 4.67, p-value 0.0002, mean increase 1.78 (CI 95% 1.14 to 2.42). Overall, all participants increased from a mean score of 3.06 to 4.71, p-value 0.0001, mean increase 1.65 (CI 95% 1.24 to 2.05). DISCUSSION: Implementation of this simulation training at our institution resulted in a significant increase in physician confidence regarding the safe performance of tracheostomy surgery in COVID-19 patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Adoption of standardized COVID-19 tracheostomy simulation training at centers treating COVID-19 patients may result in improved physician safety and enhanced confidence in anticipation of performing these procedures in real-life scenarios.

Implementation of Preoperative Screening Protocols in Otolaryngology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To highlight emerging preoperative screening protocols and document workflow challenges and successes during the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large urban tertiary care medical center. Thirty-two patients undergoing operative procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic were placed into 2 preoperative screening protocols. Early in the pandemic a "high-risk case protocol" was utilized to maximize available resources. As information and technology evolved, a "universal point-of-care protocol" was implemented. RESULTS: Of 32 patients, 25 were screened prior to surgery. Three (12%) tested positive for COVID-19. In all 3 cases, the procedure was delayed, and patients were admitted for treatment or discharged under home quarantine. During this period, 86% of operative procedures were indicated for treatment of oncologic disease. There was no significant delay in arrival to the operating room for patients undergoing point-of-care screening immediately prior to their procedure (P = .92). DISCUSSION: Currently, few studies address preoperative screening for COVID-19. A substantial proportion of individuals in this cohort tested positive, and both protocols identified positive cases. The major strengths of the point-of-care protocol are ease of administration, avoiding subsequent exposures after testing, and relieving strain on "COVID-19 clinics" or other community testing facilities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Preoperative screening is a critical aspect of safe surgical practice in the midst of the widespread pandemic. Rapid implementation of universal point-of-care screening is possible without major workflow adjustments or operative delays.